The machine passed its factory test, was dismantled, shipped, reinstalled and now bends differently from the recorded result. Nothing is visibly damaged. Between the two measurements four conditions changed: the foundation, the residual stress state of the frame, the alignment of major components after reassembly, and the calibration of the position feedback.
The complaint arrives as a general loss of accuracy rather than a specific fault: angles that need correction, flanges that no longer line up, a machine that needs a different crowning setting for the same job. Sometimes the error is a constant offset that is easy to correct; sometimes it is a wedge that cannot be corrected at all. Distinguishing the two early prevents a long argument about whether the machine or the installation is responsible.
A press brake frame is stiff in bending but not rigid in torsion. If the floor is not flat and level within the installation tolerance, bolting the frame down imposes a twist that was not present at the factory, and the ram-to-bed relationship changes along the length. Welded frames also carry residual stress; after transport, re-levelling and the first weeks of loading, that stress redistributes and the frame settles by a small but measurable amount. Reassembly introduces its own errors: scale brackets stressed in transit, backgauge rails not square, hydraulic pipes refitted with different preload. Each of these has a different geometric signature. The effect of a twist is small in absolute terms and large in angle terms, because a few hundredths of a millimetre across the bed changes the load distribution and therefore the penetration that decides the angle.
The parameters to record are floor levelness in both directions, the ram-to-bed gap at both ends, the parallelism of the ram over its stroke, the backgauge squareness to the bed, the scale calibration offset at both ends, and oil temperature at the time of measurement. Recording them at installation and again at thirty days provides both the correction data and the evidence base. Two of them are worth emphasising because they are cheap and decisive: the precision level survey, which shows whether the frame is being forced into a twist, and the ram-to-bed gap at both ends, which shows whether the machine is parallel before any hydraulic correction is applied. If both are correct and the angles are still wrong, the fault is in the compensation setting or in the tooling, and the diagnosis moves on rather than repeating the same level check.
| Symptom after installation | Mechanism indicated | Diagnostic |
|---|---|---|
| Constant wedge across the full bed | Frame twist from an unlevel foundation | Precision level across and along the bed |
| Centre error, ends correct | Deflection or crowning changed after settling | Repeat the load-level angle test used at FAT |
| Constant Y1/Y2 offset | Scale mounting or calibration disturbed | Gauge blocks at both ends, compare readouts |
| Angles correct, flanges offset | Backgauge zero lost during reassembly | Known test part against the stop face |
| Error grows through the shift | Oil temperature or cooling circuit | Temperature logged against angle |
Prepare the foundation before the machine arrives, level it with a precision level rather than a builder's spirit level, and keep the factory test record as the reference document for the acceptance test on site. Specify lifting points and never sling under the bed or on the guideways. Where the machine is built with a stress-relieved monoblock frame machined in a single set-up, settling is smaller and more predictable; our 160T/4000 synchro servo press brake and the 160 tonne hydraulic press brake range are supplied with installation and re-test instructions for exactly this reason.
A small, one-time change in the first weeks is normal and expected after transport and re-levelling. Continued change indicates a foundation, loading or assembly problem that should be investigated.
Verify them, yes. Compare the indicated position with gauge blocks at both ends and correct the offset if required, always with the machine levelled and at working temperature.
It is the cheapest test in the machine's life. Without it, a settling trend is discovered only when parts start failing, at which point the original baseline no longer explains anything.
The machine passed its factory test, was dismantled, shipped, reinstalled and now bends differently from the recorded result. Nothing is visibly damaged. Between the two measurements four conditions changed: the foundation, the residual stress state of the frame, the alignment of major components after reassembly, and the calibration of the position feedback.
The complaint arrives as a general loss of accuracy rather than a specific fault: angles that need correction, flanges that no longer line up, a machine that needs a different crowning setting for the same job. Sometimes the error is a constant offset that is easy to correct; sometimes it is a wedge that cannot be corrected at all. Distinguishing the two early prevents a long argument about whether the machine or the installation is responsible.
A press brake frame is stiff in bending but not rigid in torsion. If the floor is not flat and level within the installation tolerance, bolting the frame down imposes a twist that was not present at the factory, and the ram-to-bed relationship changes along the length. Welded frames also carry residual stress; after transport, re-levelling and the first weeks of loading, that stress redistributes and the frame settles by a small but measurable amount. Reassembly introduces its own errors: scale brackets stressed in transit, backgauge rails not square, hydraulic pipes refitted with different preload. Each of these has a different geometric signature. The effect of a twist is small in absolute terms and large in angle terms, because a few hundredths of a millimetre across the bed changes the load distribution and therefore the penetration that decides the angle.
The parameters to record are floor levelness in both directions, the ram-to-bed gap at both ends, the parallelism of the ram over its stroke, the backgauge squareness to the bed, the scale calibration offset at both ends, and oil temperature at the time of measurement. Recording them at installation and again at thirty days provides both the correction data and the evidence base. Two of them are worth emphasising because they are cheap and decisive: the precision level survey, which shows whether the frame is being forced into a twist, and the ram-to-bed gap at both ends, which shows whether the machine is parallel before any hydraulic correction is applied. If both are correct and the angles are still wrong, the fault is in the compensation setting or in the tooling, and the diagnosis moves on rather than repeating the same level check.
| Symptom after installation | Mechanism indicated | Diagnostic |
|---|---|---|
| Constant wedge across the full bed | Frame twist from an unlevel foundation | Precision level across and along the bed |
| Centre error, ends correct | Deflection or crowning changed after settling | Repeat the load-level angle test used at FAT |
| Constant Y1/Y2 offset | Scale mounting or calibration disturbed | Gauge blocks at both ends, compare readouts |
| Angles correct, flanges offset | Backgauge zero lost during reassembly | Known test part against the stop face |
| Error grows through the shift | Oil temperature or cooling circuit | Temperature logged against angle |
Prepare the foundation before the machine arrives, level it with a precision level rather than a builder's spirit level, and keep the factory test record as the reference document for the acceptance test on site. Specify lifting points and never sling under the bed or on the guideways. Where the machine is built with a stress-relieved monoblock frame machined in a single set-up, settling is smaller and more predictable; our 160T/4000 synchro servo press brake and the 160 tonne hydraulic press brake range are supplied with installation and re-test instructions for exactly this reason.
A small, one-time change in the first weeks is normal and expected after transport and re-levelling. Continued change indicates a foundation, loading or assembly problem that should be investigated.
Verify them, yes. Compare the indicated position with gauge blocks at both ends and correct the offset if required, always with the machine levelled and at working temperature.
It is the cheapest test in the machine's life. Without it, a settling trend is discovered only when parts start failing, at which point the original baseline no longer explains anything.